Tuesday, 27 September 2016

Tuesday, September 27: Critical Reading cont.

Hi class,

Link to today's presentation: Lesson 5.

To review today's class, we discussed how WHAT someone is arguing may not be nearly as important as HOW they're arguing it. We took last week's concepts/questions about how to come at a text with a certain amount of skepticism, to look more deeply at how an author presents his/her argument, and applied them to Gawande's "A Lifesaving Checklist."

SO, with that practice in mind, you're moving forward to actually writing your rhetorical analysis of either Dillon's, Cangialosi's, or Pipher's article. Also, in both classes, almost no one chose to opt for Pipher's article--hint: some of you might find it helpful to analyze hers instead. Just because rhetorical choices might be a bit more difficult to label does not mean that it will be hard to analyze. Also, in regard to Dillon's article, just because something is straightforward/short doesn't mean it will be easy to write about. Keep that in mind as you move forward.

Homework:

  • Reading
    • St. Martin's:  Chs. 8 and 13
    • FYW:  Ch. 6 (pgs. 119-152)
  • For this week, you do not have a BA, BUT you do have a Writing Reflection assignment that is due TO ME (not through RaiderWriter) in class next week.


Writing Reflection Assignment:

Purpose: Communicating to me any areas of confusion about the concepts we work with in this class. Do you struggle with summary/paraphrase? Audience/purpose? Rhetorical choices? Let me know.

Write a brief reflection--Two paragraphs, 300-400 words. Discuss:
(1) Which concepts do you have a firm grasp of?
(2) Which concepts are you struggling with?
Bring this as a HARD COPY next week to turn in to me (typed is preferred).

That should be it! Have a good week.

Tuesday, 20 September 2016

Tuesday, September 20: Critical Reading and Rhetorical Devices

Hi class,

Here's the link to this morning's presentation: Lesson 4.

Also, here's a link to the list of rhetorical devices that we discussed in class: Common Rhetorical Choices.

As you move forward, concentrate on reading critically, questioning the author/content/overall message of the text that you are analyzing. Your goal is to look deeper at a text. Come at the text with a certain amount of skepticism, and don't take it at face value.

We also discussed ethos/pathos/logos more in depth. Should you have missed class, catch up by looking through this morning's presentation. Remember, ethos/pathos/logos are not rhetorical choices; instead, they are pathways rhetorical choices take.


Homework
  • Reading:
    • St. Martin's:
      • Chapter 3a-3c, "Exploring a Topic," "Narrowing a Topic," "Drafting a Working Thesis"
      • Chapter 10h, "Moving from Hypothesis to Working Thesis"
      • Chapter 15a, "Refining Your Plans" (pgs. 40-49, 198, 250-252)
  • First-Year Writing: Ch 2 (pgs. 30-36)
  • BA3
Basic Assignment #3:
Purpose: To demonstrate your ability to identify specific rhetorical choices made by a writer
Description: For this brief assignment, using the text you will analyze for your Draft 1.1 (either Dillon's, Cangialosi's, or Pipher's articles), please do the following:
·        Identify the audience and purpose of the piece. Be as specific as possible and support your identification with a brief explanation (100-200 words).
·        Identify and list at least five rhetorical choices the writer employs to reach this audience and achieve his or her purpose. Give at least one example of each, and be sure to cite where you find each example (Author's-last-name page-number).
Remember, your assignments are due Saturday before 11:59pm. That should be it for now!

Tuesday, 13 September 2016

Tuesday, September 13: Summary and Paraphrase

First off, here's today's presentation: Lesson 3.

Announcement: You NEED to have your textbooks by now. If you have ordered them and are waiting to pick them up, you need to physically go to the bookstore and get them (the website will continue to say "out of stock" even though we know that they are in stock. In fact, Varsity has over 900 copies available, so should you come to class without your textbooks next week, your participation points will be deducted).

We covered the basics of summary and paraphrase in class today, meaning we discussed (1) the differences between the two and (2) how each are used in academic writing. We looked at what makes a good summary/paraphrase and what makes a bad summary/paraphrase. If you missed class, make sure to review the presentation posted above, as well as your readings that were due today (these include guidelines/checklists that you should look over before and after composing a summary or paraphrase).

Remember:

  • A summary is when you condense a text. Summaries can be different lengths depending on what you're using them for, but they generally should encompass the entirety of the original author's message. Make sure that you understand the text so that you can present it accurately.
  • A paraphrase is when you restate an author's words to put them in your own words. As opposed to a summary, which talks about the text, a paraphrase requires you to step into the author's shoes and rewrite their ideas in your own words. 
Homework:

  • Readings:
    • FYW: Ch. 4 (pgs. 69-100)
    • St. Martin's Handbook (pgs. 124-139)
  • BA2
Brief Assignment #2:

Objective: To demonstrate your ability to summarize and paraphrase portions of a text.
Purpose: Summarizing and paraphrasing are important skills for academic writers. You will need to be able to condense other writers' ideas into your own words so that you can write research papers, analytical papers, argumentative papers, and other types of academic writing. the length of your summary will always be determined by your purpose for writing, as well as by your intended audience.

In addition, for purposes of this course, summarizing and paraphrasing will help you prepare for the rhetorical analysis, where you will need to be able to succinctly state an author's purpose and discuss specific passages of an article. For this assignment, you will write two summaries of a text and a paraphrase of a small portion of a text. Use the discussion about summaries and paraphrases in Part 3, Section 13c-d  of The St. Martin’s Handbook to assist you in doing so.

Description, Part One, Article Summaries
Your instructor will tell you which article from your First-Year Writing textbook you will use for your summaries. 
(Pick one of the three articles: Dillon's "What Corporate America Can't Build," Cangialosi's "Healing through the Written Word," or Pipher's "Writing to Connect." Start thinking of which article you would like to write your rhetorical analysis over and work with that article). 
You will write two summaries of the assigned article. The first summary will be a single sentence in length. The next summary will be five sentences in length. Strategies for completing both will be discussed in class. Before turning in your summaries, please make sure you label them as either "One Sentence Summary" or "Five Sentence Summary."

Description, Part Two, Paraphrase
After you’ve completed your summaries, you will paraphrase a brief passage selected by your instructor. 
(Paraphrase paragraph six of Atul Gawande's "A Lifesaving Checklist"--pgs. 99-100 in FYW.)
Your goal in this portion of the assignment is to restate the ideas of the passage in your own words and do so in a way that is readable and understandable. Label this final portion of the assignment as "Paraphrase." If your instructor gives you more than one passage to choose from, make sure you add the author's name and page number of the passage to your label.

That should be it for now! Should you have any questions, email me or come by office hours. 


Tuesday, 6 September 2016

Tuesday, September 6: Reading Rhetorically

Hi class,

Here's the link to today's presentation: Lesson 2. Should you feel so inclined, feel free to watch the rhetorical analysis video of Taylor Swift's "Blank Space" music video--there are others like it available on YouTube as well.

If you have not gotten logged into RaiderWriter yet, PLEASE email me about getting logged in. Your BA1 was due on Saturday night, and I expect each and every one of you to get into the system and get your assignment submitted. Know that every day your assignment is late, a penalty is applied by the RaiderWriter system.

You DO NOT have a BA due this Saturday night... Yay! However, you do have readings to complete for next week (as listed on the presentation):


  • FYW: 
    • Ch. 1 (pgs. 1-16) 
    • Ch. 6 (pgs. 129-133)
    • Ch. 2 (pgs. 17-37)
    • Ch. 3 (pgs. 39-49 and 54-68)
    • Ch. 23 "Three Mile Island and the Billion Dollar Memo"
  • St. Martin's Handbook:
    • Ch. 1 "Expectations for College Writing"
    • Ch. 20a "Reading Texts in the Humanities" (pgs. 14-22)
    • Pgs. 300-301
    • Ch. 13c-d "Paraphrases" and "Summaries"
    • Pgs. 236-237
That should be it for now! Email me if you have any questions.

Thursday, 1 September 2016

Update on Textbooks

On Tuesday, I told you that if you could not find the FYW textbook by today to email me. I have since discussed the situation with the powers above me at TTU, and I am told that B&N, Varsity, Double T, etc. DO in fact have copies of the textbook onsite; however, you must physically GO to these stores. If you check online, the textbook will still be listed as out of stock/on backorder, but they do have copies in the stores. Let me know if you have any more trouble.